Jpn. J. Infect. Dis., 57, 97-102, 2004

To see a printable version of the article in the Adobe file format, click this [PDF] link.

Original Article

Tetanus Antibody Assay Combining In-House ELISA and Particle Agglutination Test and Its Serosurvey Application in a Province in Turkey

Nilay Coplu*, Berrin Esen, Aysegul Gozalan, Kikuko Miyamura1, Iwao Yoshida1, Demet Kurtoglu, Nuvide Ozturk Dogan2, Gokhan Afacan, Ahmet Unal2, Setsuji Ishida1 and Motohide Takahashi3

Communicable Diseases Research Department and 2Biological Products Quality Control Department, Refik Saydam National Hygiene Center, Ankara 06100, Turkey, 1Japan International Cooperation Agency, Tokyo 151-8558 and 3Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 208-0011, Japan

(Received October 29, 2003. Accepted March 10, 2004)


*Corresponding author: Mailing address: Communicable Diseases Research Department, Refik Saydam National Hygiene Center, Sihhiye, Ankara 06100, Turkey. Tel & Fax: +90-312-431-2885, E-mail: rssalgin@saglik.gov.tr


SUMMARY: In order to determine a practically useful quantitative assay method for tetanus antibody in a large-scale seroepidemiological study, a method combining an in-house ELISA with a particle agglutination test (KPA) was evaluated in comparison with the in vivo mouse neutralization test. Serum samples with mouse neutralization antibody titers 0.01 IU/ml (the minimum protective level) or below showed considerable overestimation of antitoxin titers up to 1.0 IU/ml when studied by in-house ELISA alone. On the other hand, the KPA values were highly correlated with the mouse test, even in cases of titers equal to 0.01 IU/ml or below. The combination of these two procedures, in which in-house ELISA values of 1.0 IU/ml or below were replaced by KPA values, provided a high correlation in antibody titers with the mouse test (r = 0.968). We applied this combined method to a tetanus seroepidemiological survey in a province in Turkey. The survey included 347 subjects from the healthy population, and the quantitative analyses showed high antibody levels in children and young adults and significantly low levels among adults aged 40 or over. A characteristic distribution of antibody titers in each age group was also demonstrated.


Go to JJID Homepage             Go to JJID 57 (3) Contents